Blog

Higher Education Budgeting Best Practices: A Guide for Enrollment Leaders

Liaison
Dec 6, 2024

Key Takeaways:

  • Higher education faces intensified financial pressures, requiring strategic budgeting to balance immediate enrollment needs with long-term sustainability.
  • Collaboration with key stakeholders, especially CFOs, is essential for aligning budget plans with institutional goals and ensuring effective resource allocation.
  • Accurate financial projections and regular budget reviews enable enrollment leaders to adapt to evolving market demands and enrollment trends.
  • Higher education budgeting best practices, such as leveraging flexible budget models, gaining stakeholder buy-in, and prioritizing adaptability, help institutions navigate economic challenges and achieve stability.

The pandemic significantly altered the world of higher education, introducing new challenges, from the rise of online learning to a changing relationship between university staff and administration. Yet, one pressing issue that persists—and has perhaps even intensified—is the reality of limited budgets. The phrase “doing more with less” fails to capture the full extent of the pressure facing today’s higher education leaders. With growing competition for online enrollments, persistent difficulties in meeting enrollment targets, and rising turnover among staff, many institutions are being asked to stretch their resources further than ever before.

As the higher education industry faces institutional closures and economic strain, the pressure on graduate enrollment management (GEM) leaders to meet expectations within tighter financial constraints is rising. In this new reality, strategic financial planning is crucial to navigating these turbulent times. It begins with a deep understanding of the budget landscape and the tools needed to manage these challenges.

Understanding Your Budget Requirements

For enrollment leaders, financial planning involves much more than simply tracking expenses; it requires a comprehensive understanding of the key factors that drive success in student acquisition and retention. From branding efforts such as advertising to lead generation activities, including student list purchases and yield events, every layer of the enrollment funnel requires thoughtful budget allocation. These decisions not only affect current pipelines, but also determine the long-term sustainability of the institution’s enrollment strategy.

Collaboration with key stakeholders, especially the CFO, is critical when determining where and how funds should be allocated. A well-crafted budget should reflect both the immediate needs of enrollment efforts and the broader goals of the institution. By involving the CFO and other decision makers early in the process, enrollment leaders can better align their financial plans with institutional priorities, paving the way for smoother budget approvals and more effective resource utilization.

Creating Realistic Financial Projections

One of the most crucial aspects of successful financial planning is creating projections that accurately reflect enrollment targets, operational costs, and potential growth. Enrollment leaders must account for the unique challenges that come with student acquisition costs in higher education, which can vary greatly between programs. Understanding these costs, and managing them effectively, is essential for making informed financial decisions that support short-term and long-term goals.

Identifying the break-even points for each program is another key strategy in this process. This requires a careful analysis of tuition revenue versus expenses, including faculty salaries, marketing investments, and student services. Knowing when a program becomes profitable allows leaders to prioritize resources toward the most sustainable initiatives.

Institutional leaders should revisit projections frequently to adapt to changing circumstances—whether due to shifting market demands, enrollment trends, or goals. Establishing a culture of regular review and adjustment ensures that financial plans remain aligned with evolving realities so enrollment teams can stay nimble and responsive in a fast-paced higher education environment.

4 Higher Education Budgeting Best Practices

Effective budgeting in higher education requires a proactive approach that responds to current financial conditions while anticipating future needs. Consider these strategies:

Budget models in higher education act as a framework for forecasting revenue, expenses, and resource allocation. Experiment with various types, such as incremental budgeting (adjusting the previous year’s budget) or performance-based models (tying funding to specific results like enrollment growth). Each model can provide a guide for making solid financial decisions.

Begin by analyzing past performance to understand trends and identify areas for improvement. Consider adopting a hybrid model that combines traditional budgeting with performance indicators, which may allow for more dynamic distribution of resources. Implement key metrics such as student retention rates, graduation numbers, and enrollment targets to inform financial decisions and adjust funding where it will have the most impact.

Establish a process for routine reviews to track spending against projections. This facilitates real-time adjustments so financial plans stay aligned with strategic goals while identifying inefficiencies that may impact performance.

Set a quarterly or semi-annual budget review schedule with key stakeholders and encourage each department to present its financial performance in relation to enrollment outcomes. Use these reviews as an opportunity to reallocate funds from underperforming areas to initiatives showing growth potential. By incorporating rolling forecasts into the process, you can adjust projections based on real-time data rather than relying solely on initial annual budgets.

Addressing concerns about budget cuts or limited resources requires a thoughtful approach centered on collaboration and open communication. One of the most effective ways to overcome discomfort around budgeting is by engaging stakeholders—such as department heads, faculty, and financial officers—early and often in the financial planning process. When key players are involved, they are more likely to support budget decisions, even when tough compromises are necessary.

Education plays a crucial role in gaining this buy-in. By providing clear, data-driven insights into how budgeting decisions impact enrollment outcomes, leaders can ease concerns and build consensus. Regular updates and transparent conversations further ensure that stakeholders remain engaged and committed to shared financial goals, making it easier to implement budgetary changes that support both immediate needs and long-term sustainability.

Make room for adaptability. Financial plans that are responsive to evolving institutional needs, market demands, and enrollment trends allow the institution to stay agile in a rapidly changing higher education landscape.

Design your budget with contingency funds in mind, allocating a percentage of your total resources for unforeseen circumstances, such as an unexpected dip in enrollment or new program investments. Identifying nonessential spending areas that can be scaled back if necessary, offers greater flexibility to reallocate resources to priority areas. Also, regularly reassessing institutional priorities ensures the budget remains responsive to new opportunities or challenges.

Strategic Budgeting: A Path to Long-Term Success

Strategic budgeting is not just a necessity for enrollment leaders—it’s a critical tool for maintaining institutional stability and growth. Mastering the financial planning process involves understanding the complexities of budget models in higher education, managing student acquisition costs, and collaborating with key stakeholders, including the CFO. By applying these higher education budgeting best practices, leaders can navigate constraints more effectively and secure their financial futures.


About the Author

Written by Stephen Taylor, Vice President, Graduate Enrollment Strategy at Liaison. With over 20 years of experience leading and supporting large grad teams and a leadership philosophy focused on culture building, Stephen brings a unique perspective to the trends shaping higher education. You can find his most recent interview with Forbes here!

Liaison

You may also enjoy

Over the last three decades, Liaison has helped over 40,000 programs on more than 1,200 campuses more effectively manage admissions through its Centralized Application Service (CAS™) technology and complementary application processing and support services. The higher education technology leader supports its partner institutions’ total enrollment goals by pairing CAS with its Enrollment Marketing (EM) platform as well as the recently acquired TargetX (CRM) and advanced analytics software Othot.